I know the title of this
review sounds harsh and shocking, but I believe it to be entirely
accurate. Rather than dealing with the
individual errors in episodes 2 & 3 of The
Bible (a task better left to those who have two hour daily broadcasts since
there was not a single scene in the The Bible that accurately reflects the
text of the Bible and the errors are simply too numerous for anyone who
shepherds a flock and preaches every week to deal with in detail) I want to
address two profoundly dangerous intentional theological errors that permeate these
episodes.
The first thematic heresy is
the elimination of sin and repentance from The
Bible. If a person who isn’t
familiar the Bible were to take their understanding of God from the The Bible they would be entirely unaware
of sin and God’s righteous wrath and judgment against sin and what a godly
response to an awareness of sin in the life of a believer is.
This denial of sin and the
need for repentance first comes to the fore in The Bible’s treatment of the book of Judges. Through the voice of the narrator The Bible identifies the root of the
chaos in Israel in the period of the judges is a “lack of strong leaders like Moses
and Joshua.” But Scripture clearly identifies the source of the problems in Israel as God’s judgment against Israel for doing what was evil in the sight of the LORD and worshiping idols.
It is not just sin that was
ignored it was also repentance and it was ignored in a spectacular manner. The treatment of two of the greatest chapters
on repentance in the Old Testament, 2 Samuel 12 and Daniel 4 are illustrative
of The Bible’s view of
repentance. It blasphemously mangles one
and completely ignores the other.
Second Samuel 12, Nathan’s
confrontation with David over his sin with Bathsheba and his murder of Uriah
the Hittite, records no immediate
response from David, although when his son is afflicted (as Nathan foretold) he
fasts and spends days prostrating himself before God. David’s heart response to the exposure of his
sin is recorded in Psalm 51 and it expresses profound brokenness, admissions of
guilt before a holy God, pleas for mercy, and promises to bear witness to the
word of God to others (The Bible puts
the words of Psalm 51 in the mouth of Daniel in a manner that teaches that
obedience in difficult circumstance robs the believer of the joy of their
salvation). Taken together Psalm 51 and
2 Samuel 12 paint a picture of David as a man broken over his sin and his
standing before a holy God.
But how does The Bible claim that David reacted? After being confronted by Nathan and hearing
that God declared that his son will die as a judgment on the sin of David and Bathsheba
the David of The Bible (not the
Bible) defiantly says “We’ll see.” That
is not artistic license, that is showing David displaying the exact opposite
behavior and attitude that is recorded in Scripture. The Bible’s teaching on David is the
exact opposite of the Bible’s teaching about David. This is a lie straight from the pit of hell,
and exactly how the serpent twisted the Word of God in the garden.
And just as bad is The Bible’s ignoring of Daniel 4. Nebuchadnezzar is a major character in The Bible episode 3. And according to the The Bible he goes insane in response to Shadrack, Meshack and Abedndigo
being delivered from being burned at the stake (not a fiery furnace) and
seemingly dies bound in chains in a dungeon (that’s how he is last seen in the
episode). However the Bible records that
Nebuchadnezzar is struck with madness as judgment for the sin of pride years later. This
is a serious enough error, but it is the omission of Nebuchadnezzar’s
repentance that is truly stomach turning.
Daniel 4:34-37 (a passage I quoted in my baptismal testimony because my
pre-salvation life was characterized by the sin of pride) records
Nebuchadnezzar’s confession of repentance.
Nebuchadnezzar didn’t die in a dungeon as an insane unrepentant sinner,
he died as a redeemed believer who became one of the authors of inspired scripture
(Daniel 4:34-37 records in its entirety a letter written by the repentant king). But since in The Bible there is no sin there is certainly no need for
repentance. Again The Bible teaches the
exact opposite of what the Bible teaches!
As sickening as its message
on repentance and sin is, The Bible’s
view of Jesus is out and out undisguised blasphemy. They functionally deny His role as savior and
His deity.
There are no more important passages in
all of Scripture for understanding who Jesus is than the accounts of his
baptism. When John (the baptist) sees him approaching
he exclaims “behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world” and
when Jesus comes up out of the water the Spirit descends on Him like a dove, and the Father speaks from heaven “this is my beloved Son with whom I am well pleased.” But guess what is missing from
The Bible’s account. John’s confession, the Spirit descending, and
the Father Speaking. No trinity, no sacrificial
lamb, and no deity, just blasphemy. The
Jesus of The Bible is no more the
Jesus of the Bible than the Jesus of the Book of Mormon, the Koran or the Oprah
Winfrey Network. And incidentally (and it is incidental at this
point) in a profound twisting of Luke 5 the Jesus of The Bible came not to save sinners from the wrath of God but to “change
the world.”
The
Bible presents lies as truth by twisting scripture until it
teaches the exact opposite message than the living and active Word of God. This has been the devil’s favorite tool to
drag people into hell since the beginning.
It is what he did in the Garden, it’s what he did when he tempted Jesus,
and it is what he is doing now on the History Channel.
[And if your interested check out my new blog of Marriage, Love, Multiple Sclerosis and Suffering here]
Thanks for posting this ... I am leading a home group that will discuss some of these very things on Wednesday and you've pointed out some additional points. My initial thoughts are at http://kiteline.wordpress.com/2013/03/24/a-berean-ntermission/.
ReplyDeleteI think you are on the right track on your blog, I will be praying for you and your church.
DeleteThanks John. Are you going to review the remainder of the episodes, or do you have a link to someone who has done so? Thanks Again!
ReplyDeleteI am actually working on a post about whay I read bad books/watch bead shows but didn't bother to watch the lat two episodes of the "bible" Check out Chris Rosbraugh at pirate Christian Radio, he has a lot on this.
Delete